icon-symbol-logout-darkest-grey

Gastprofessur für WissenschaftskommunikationNature Marsilius Gastprofessur

Die im Wintersemester 2018/2019 eingerichtete Gastprofessur für Wissenschaftskommunikation ist eine gemeinsame Initiative von Holtzbrinck Berlin, der Klaus Tschira Stiftung (KTS) und der Ruperto Carola.
 

Mit Förderung der KTS werden ausgewiesene Experten an die Universität Heidelberg eingeladen, um in unterschiedlichen Veranstaltungsformaten zu vermitteln, was eine qualitativ hochwertige Berichterstattung über wissenschaftliche Arbeit und wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse ausmacht. Zugleich sollen sie eine breit angelegte Diskussion über neue Formen des Austauschs zwischen Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit anstoßen.

Mit der Einrichtung der Gastprofessur möchten die drei Partner das Bewusstsein für die stark gewachsene Bedeutung von Wissenschaftskommunikation schärfen. Die Gastprofessur soll einen Beitrag dazu leisten, angesichts einer immer komplexer werdenden Forschungslandschaft die gesellschaftliche Teilhabe an der Gestaltung von Zukunft durch Wissenschaft zu ermöglichen.

Springer Nature Gastprofessur, Vertragsunterzeichnung

Als Gastprofessor:innen werden Persönlichkeiten berufen, die für exzellente Wissenschaftskommunikation und Qualitätsjournalismus stehen. Neben der Förderung dieser Bereiche sollen Nachwuchswissenschaftler:innen darin geschult werden, ihre Forschung und ihre Forschungsergebnisse besser an die Öffentlichkeit zu vermitteln. Angesiedelt ist die „Nature Marsilius Gastprofessur“ am Marsilius-Kolleg der Ruperto Carola, eine Einrichtung der Exzellenzuniversität, die interdisziplinäre Brücken zwischen den Wissenschaftskulturen am Standort Heidelberg fördert.

 

ACHTE NATURE MARSILIUS GASTPROFESSUR: FIONA FOX

Fiona Fox ist Geschäftsführerin und Gründungsdirektorin des Science Media Centre, das seit seiner Gründung im Jahr 2002 zu einer wichtigen Ressource für Wissenschaftsjournalisten im Vereinigten Königreich geworden ist. Sie hat einen Abschluss in Journalismus und mehrere Jahre Erfahrung in der Medienarbeit für namhafte britische Organisationen, darunter unter anderem das Equal Opportunities Committee und CAFOD. Für ihre Verdienste um die Wissenschaft hat sie mehrere Auszeichnungen erhalten, darunter einen „Order oft he British Empire“ und ehrenvolle Mitgliedschaften in der Royal Society, der Academy of Medical Sciences, der Royal Society of Biology und der British Pharmacological Society. Außerdem ist Fiona Fox Autorin von "Beyond the Hype: Inside Science’s Biggest Media Scandals from Climategate to Covid".

Porträt: Fiona Fox

Fireside-Chat

Den Auftakt der 8. Nature Marsilius Gastprofessur bildete ein Kamingespräch mit Kollegiat:innen des Marsilius-Kollegs am Montag, 3. Juni 2024.

Öffentlicher Vortrag

Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2024, 19.00 Uhr, Aula der Alten Universität

Kurse

COURSE 1
Why and how scientists should engage with the media on scientific controversies?

Target group: PhD students, Postdocs, Professors 
Group 1: Fri., 07.06.2024, 10:00-14:00
Group 2: Tue., 11.06.2024, 10:00-14:00
INF 130.1, Seminar Room 01.105

Embark on an inspiring journey to discover the pivotal role of scientists in shaping media narratives on controversial scientific topics. "Bridging the Gap" is an invigorating two-part course designed to equip scientists with the knowledge and tools to effectively engage with the media, fostering more accurate and evidence-based coverage. This seminar extends a warm invitation to all intrigued by the potential of media engagement to transform public discourse on science. 

In the first section, participants will be guided through a captivating exploration of real-world examples, demonstrating the profound impact scientists can have by stepping into the media spotlight. Through a series of example-led presentations, attendees will witness firsthand the power of direct engagement in correcting misconceptions and steering the conversation towards a more informed and evidence-backed understanding.

Transitioning to the second half, the spotlight turns to the Science Media Centre (SMC) model, a beacon of independence and innovation in science communication. As the only press office that stands entirely apart from institutional affiliations, the SMC model champions an unbiased and unbridled approach to media relations. Participants will gain exclusive insights into the unique selling points of this model and why it represents a valuable blueprint for the future. Moreover, this section promises an open forum for debate, inviting critical perspectives and lively discussion on the model's merits and challenges.

Join us for this engaging seminar, where the spirit of inquiry meets the desire to make a difference. Whether you're a scientist eager to navigate the complexities of media engagement or simply passionate about the integrity of science communication, this course offers a warm, inclusive environment to learn, challenge, and inspire.


COURSE 2
Should scientists advocate for particular policies and get involved in politics?

Target group: PhD students, Postdocs, Professors 
Group 1: Fri., 14.06.2024 – 10:00-14:00
Group 2: Thu., 20.06.2024 – 10:00-14:00
INF 130.1, Seminar Room 01.105

Embark on an intellectual voyage into the heart of a pressing and perennial question: Should scientists step beyond the bounds of research to advocate for policies and engage in the political arena? This seminar, designed for the curious minds of PhD students, postdocs, and professors, offers a comprehensive forum to explore the intricate dance between science and politics through the lens of media and public debate.

As scientists' roles in society evolve, many argue their expertise and evidence-based research uniquely qualify them to influence policy and challenge political narratives. This view posits that engaging in political advocacy is not only an opportunity but a duty for scientists, aiming to steer society towards informed, evidence-based decisions. However, this path is fraught with complex challenges and ethical considerations. Does political involvement risk the impartiality and trust vested in the scientific community? Can scientists maintain their credibility while actively participating in political discourse?

This seminar promises a deep dive into these dilemmas, offering a platform for rigorous debate and reflection. Participants will be encouraged to examine the fine line between advocacy and activism, exploring whether it's possible to maintain scientific objectivity while advocating for change. Drawing on examples, surveys, and studies, we'll dissect the factors driving public trust in science and scrutinize the consequences of scientists' increased visibility in political debates.

Join us for a series of thought-provoking sessions that aim not only to question but also to illuminate the potential pathways for scientists in the realms of policy advocacy and political engagement. Together, we will navigate the challenging yet potentially rewarding landscape where science meets society, deliberating on how best to wield the power of scientific expertise in shaping a better world.

COURSE 3 
The changing role of science communication 

Target group: Open to all university members
Tue., 18.06.2024 10:00 – 12:30
INF 130.1, Lecture Hall 00.101
Co-Instructor: Dr. Volker Stollorz (Science Media Center Germany, Cologne)

The landscape of science communication is undergoing significant transformation. This engaging course addresses the pressing concerns surrounding the shift towards a more corporate and risk-averse approach in science communication, which potentially jeopardizes open dialogue and undermines public trust in science. Featuring a dialogue between myself and Volker Stollorz, the head of SMC Germany, the session promises to unfold the broader implications for science media relations today. 

We delve into a comprehensive review conducted in 2022 on the evolving role of science press officers in the UK. By scrutinizing the influence of media on scientific discourse, participants will be invited to examine real-world examples, both positive and negative, to better understand the consequences of excluding prominent scientists from media narratives. Concluding with a robust discussion on potential strategies to counteract these trends, the course aims to present the SMC model as a beacon of hope for revitalizing authentic and impactful science communication. Join us for an immersive session that not only highlights the challenges but also charts a path forward in the quest for maintaining the integrity and accessibility of science communication.

Registration

For Registration